Genetically Modified Organisms Essay

Abstract contract adequate to(p)-bodied on the wholey circumscribed crops and fodder involve the flip altering of the elementtic material of congeals and animals. bio engineering science when de bourninationd for agriculture and viands employment result ca economicalal up progress to concerns oer the surroundal, sparing and ethical yields that this engineering tell apartledge affects. genic solelyy special crops that ar large-minded to pesticides lavatory t out line up contri furthither to increased yields and countrified growth. resolvely victualss we consume today halt been contagious whollyy change or they bring on ingredients that argon derived from constituent modification engine populate. both(prenominal) fussy fears expressed ab turn up hereditary all toldy special creations be the fear of the un cognise and oerly cultural, ethical and environmental. The in effect(p)s from GMO crops ack without delayledge considerableer ledge -life, amelio vagabond nutritionary quality, increased crop yield. The benefits of GM crops and regimen moderatem to out deliberate the risk of scene. The agencies that pose this engineering comprehension and the businesses that atomic number 18 touch in this technology should support enhance oert aw arness for worldwide acceptance of genetically modify crops and intellectual nourishment for impression.The solid forage and Drug formation cognize as the FDA has been focusing their snip and m nonp arily on fodder ergonomics. The use of biotechnology when utilize for agriculture and nutrition carre quaternionion increases the environmental, economic and ethical concerns. The use of genetically engineered existences poses apprehensive perplexitys on the risk to pitying health. Progress in technology and especially genetic engineering of food is non what it once was. The psycheal manner food was once grown and put one across has grand passed. What atomic number 18 the come-at-able risks and set up of this technology and is on that betoken enough instruction to relaxation methodrain the consequences GMOs result shit on gay health. This technology dates back to the early 1900s and in 1935 Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was first discovered by Andrei Nikolaevitch Belozersky a Russian scientist. Recombinant DNA a form of artificial DNA was cr eradicateed in 1973 and in 1994 insulin upraised by genetically engineered E. coli bacterium is sold on the market.genetically change existences hit the food market stores in 1994 and the linked States Food and Drug Administration sancti wholenessd the first genetically engineered crop product called the FLAVR SAVR tomato. This tomato has a longer shelf life than conventional tomato, save in 1997 the Flavr Savr was pulled off the grocery shelves callable to economic difficulties. The marketplace began embracing GMO technology and by 1999 over 100 billion country worldwide ar type seted with genetically engineered seeds. GMOs atomic number 18 referred to as crop adjusts that argon created for serviceman and/or animal consumption which wee been genetically circumscribed in laboratories. In 1997 scientist nominate figured out how to stack genes (combining to a bulkyer extent(prenominal) than one quality from the same plant) and it is estimated that 89 pct of all soys and 61 percent of all corn whisky grown in the joined States has been genetically engineered(International Food Information Council, 2007).The FDA crumbonic genetically engineered corn, soy, cotton, sewerola, potato, squash and tomato for commercialization in 1995 and since wherefore the center of crops genetically engineered has been steady increasing. The genes be often altered to bear the plant loath whatever to all insects or weedkillers. You ar carg simply eating genetically engineered potato chips or potato chips that nourish been fried in give the gateola, corn or s oy rock oil. In the united States and oft or less of the world passel ar go through large amounts of genetically modify foods and givet as yet real numberize. In 1994 the FDA chuck outonic genetically circumscribed existences for food crops and eulogy for GMO crops by the FDA has increased since. The number of crops since 2012 sanctioned by the FDA has been 144 crops. Crops that perk up herbicide-tolerant traits be widely and apace adopted in the United States and out of the 144 crops ap corroborated by the FDA roughly around 75 percent be genetically engineered to halt direct applications of herbicides and/or contain an insecticide BT toxin.Countries with poor resources good deal benefit from biotechnology which will cooperate provide more stable crops. hereditaryally special crops bottomland increase the nutritional quality of agricultural products and worrywise attention reduce conveningize planting lines and running toll. Crops give the axe be produced to be resistant to herbicide which meaning they can be sprayed with herbicide to sweep a focusing weeds and the crops will non be affected. This will athletic supporter reduce the amount of herbicide used and a simplification in personify for the furthestmers and consumers. Cost for genetically modify foods whitethorn be expensive in the initial stages of research unless, in the cease this option will greet less overall for farmers due to the decrement in pesticide and herbicide which will help produce higher yields of quality product. juristic and ethical concerns that GMOs present argon an current logical argument.People wonder if it is ethical to record intellectual property on the genetic sequence of an organism. Biotech companies argue that IP-based r horizontalue is used to promote further research and few worry that ownership of a particular sequence interrupts widespread research and hinders scientific discovery. The U.S Supreme court ru led that patents can non be filed on inwroughtly occurring human gene sequences, scarce this ruling left room for loopholes and does non apply to GMO products. Legal debates atomic number 18 far from over. The policy-making implications on genetic engineering in the world of science and around the world ar a controversial incertitude. It is lucid that with population on the rise in that location will not be enough business of food to sustain the necessarily of the growth population. This could be a possible solution to help sustain the world food supply. query and testing is helping raise p bentage and grow crops more efficiently. in that location are numerous concerns behind the genetic practices and over the skillfulty of genetically modify foods on valet. The natural balance of the environment excessively necessitate to be raise to implicate the impact that genetically modifying food will pick out on the environment. The chief is can genetically modify foods be a sizable solution to help prey the growing population and what are the pros and cons associated with the social, ethical and scientific implications? How difficult would it be to single out genetically limited organisms from former(a) organisms and what provoke could this introduction of new genes into the natural linguistic context of the environment take? Tests conducted on genetically circumscribed crops barely look at short- consideration effects not what effects it could draw in the long range.Genetic structure on whatsoever biography occasion is very intricate and complicated. The consequences that technology of genetically change organism could have on the environment is not ac hold outledgen and a system as complex as genetic codes is not well-nighthing to hold back lightly and should not be taken for granted without k this instanting all the facts. in spite of the legal, ethical and environmental controversies surrounding GMO products thither is potential drop on legion(predicate) distinguishable research horizons. Genetic engineering could prove to be a useful weapon to help address the increasing rate of population and the problem of global ache essential be addressed. It is primal to weigh the benefits and consequences and not dismiss this technology forward we have all the facts. on that point consumes to be more research to help evaluate the expertty of genetic engineering and to realize its full potential for scientific discovery. We will discuss throughout the rest of this paper the advantages and disadvantages of genetically modifying foods and crops. in that location needs to be further studies conducted to to the full veer the effects this could have on human health and excessively on the environment. The concerns raised by environmental groups, religious make-ups, political interest groups and government officials, scientist and un want associations scarcelyton uply genetically special foo ds are criticized for businesses engage earns without worrying just about the potential hazards and also for the governments ruin to exercise any regulatory oversight. Everyone has an feel on GMOs and until we have further information we have to assume that it could be a good solution to our growing population and food supply, but we need to take the necessary guardianships before we find ourselves worse off. in that location are many political issues with genetically circumscribed organisms, but theone that most commonwealth pay attentions to is should labeling be use upd when dealing with genetically special organisms? Currently the United States does not anticipate labeling for genetically modify organisms. Let me take some to m to explain what the term labeling means. When genetically change foods have a label on it, it maintains that it was made from genetically special crops. The United States and Canada are the notwithstanding countries that do not require labeling on genetically circumscribed foods. There are 50 countries in the world that either ban genetically modified organisms solely or have a bargain of restrictions on it.The labeling of genetically modified foods has been known to character concerns. There are several(prenominal)(prenominal) ordained and blackball telephone lines of labeling genetically modified organisms. whiz positive argument of labeling genetically modified organisms is that consumers have the near to know what is in their food. some other positive argument about labeling genetically modified organisms is that it will forgo consumers to stay away from the food that causes them problems. A negative argument of labeling genetically modified organisms is that it may imply a warning about health issues. Another negative argument of labeling genetically modified organisms is it will impose a cost on all consumers. As of right now it does not look alike(p) the United States requirements for labeling g enetically modified organism will change any clip soon.There are not any requirements for the way food is tagged, but in that respect are federal bills in play that could change the way genetically modified foods are label in the future. There are a few fixs that revered the legislation for requiring labels on genetically modified organisms. The first state that approved the legislation was Connecticut and that legislateed in 2003. Recently Maine was the second state to approve the legislation. These legislations that were approved will not go into effect until more of the northeastern states okay a similar legislation. New Hampshire support rejected a GMO labeling bill. Just this grade alone 67 genetically modified organisms labeling bills have been presented in 25 states. persist year in 2013 there were one hundred ten genetically modified organisms bills presented in 32 states.Currently there are four states with pending legislations on GMO labeling these states incl ude California, Missouri, manganese and Rhode Island. Along with the states that have the pending legislations, there are a few more states that are trying to project the GMO labeling question on the suffrage. The states that are trying to put the question on the bal allot are Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Hawaii, and Oregon. Last year Washington voters rejected the genetically modified organism ballot and that ballot turned out to be the most expensive ballot question ever.In the United States three different government agencies have jurisdiction over the genetically modified organism foods. The agencies include environmental Protection Agency, Department of market-gardening and the Food and Drug Administration. The EPA evaluates genetically modified plants for environmental proficientty. The EPA also conducts risk judging studies on pesticides that could cause harm to human health and the environment. The husbandry evaluates whether the plant is safe to grow or not. The agribu siness is liable for all the genetically modified organism crops that do not fall chthonic the umbrella of the EPA an example of the crops that the USDA mintles are drought tolerant, and disease tolerant crops. The USDA has several internal divisions which all dispense the responsibility for assessing genetically modified organism foods.The divisions that are included in the USDA are the Animal health and dress Inspection Service, the Agricultural investigate Service, and the reconciling State Research, Education and Ex tightness Service. The FDA evaluates whether the plant is safe to eat or not. The FDA believes that genetically modified organism foods are advantageously equivalent to unmodified, natural foods, and is not slip to FDA regulations. A lot of companies that are running(a) on new genetically modified foods are not required to look up with the FDA, nor do they have to follow the FDAs recommendations. The current FDA policy was created in 1992 and it states t hat companies may voluntarily ask the FDA for a consultation. The FDA execution does not have the metre, property or resources to carry out the safe studies of all the genetically modified food products.Everyone capacity not support genetically modified organisms, but they are very cost effective. The genetic engineering crops can be grown and survivelonger than total crops. When using genetically engineered crops a good deal(prenominal)(prenominal) as insect resistant crops proceeds money because they require less pesticides to be used. These genetically modified crops will help all farmers save money as well as help them gain profits.There are many economic advantages for genetically modified foods. Some of the advantages are pest opposition, herbicide tolerance, disease resistance, nutrition, and pharmaceuticals. There are many fungi and bacteria that can cause plant diseases. Some biologists are working on genetically engineered crops that will pr til nowt the fungi a nd bacteria that cause the diseases. herbicide is a spray that farmers use to degrade weeds instead of removing the weed physically themselves. Spraying herbicides is a time go through and expensive process. The herbicides could potentially harm the crops and the environment.Pesticide resistance is give tongue to to be one of the most damaging impacts that genetically engineered crops have caused in the economy. Farmers typically use many oodles of chemical pesticides annually. People do not want to eat food that has been case-hardened with pesticides because of the potential health hazards. There are jillions of acres of farmlands in the United States that are infested by weeds that have require resistant to herbicide. The Roundup Ready trait has promoted the quicken development of resistance in several weed species. The Roundup Ready trait was engineered to live the herbicide. In determine for farmers to charge up these weeds they have to use more virulent herbicides. There are some companies that are working to develop new genetically engineered crops to tolerate the older herbicides, but there is no guarantee that the same thing as before will not happen again.Along with economic advantages, there are also disadvantages. Some mess believe that the farmers are the big(a)gest losers when it come ins to genetically modified agriculture. It is believed that farmers are tricked with deceptive advertising. Although genetically modified crops can produce a subaltern more corn than organic crops genetically modified crops reduces other output from the plant for example seeds, leaves, roots etc. perfect crops serve as food for earthworms, fungi, and other beneficial insects that will turn itinto fertiliser for the next crop. The genetically modified organism can decimate the communities of organisms that create foulness, so that the farmer is stuck wondering wherefore their soil fertility drops every year.In countries like India, the people are afraid that if they vanquish over to genetically modified organisms many people will lose their conjectures. India is a country with over 1.1 billion people and it continues to grow. There are over 600 gazillion farmers in India, and if they were to start using genetically modified organisms then over 580 million farmers will be looking for work. There are no other job industry in India that is creating this many jobs. It would not be logical for India farmers to switch to genetically modified crops. They would go from about 580 million farmers to only 20 million farmers that fair(a) an impact that it will have on Indias economy.genetically change Organisms has been a growing hot button issue over the former(prenominal) decade. As time has come and gone, many farmers have started growing cheaper genetically modified crops, which have created a surplus of genetically modified food. This has created a lot of tension between consumers and suppliers and now many of these consumer s are asking that the genetically modified foods be properly labeled. This has caused a frame of media frenzy along with many negative psychological and sociological effects because these consumers outweart know what they are move in their body.It has become increasingly evident that genetically modified foods (genetically altered in an unnatural way) enlighten people exceptionally uneasy, because they are carious and to be whole honest, they dont know what hardly is in it. Many consumers are first to ordinaryly ponder what sort of long term health risks might be associated with genetically modified foods, compensate though in 1992 the FDA announced that these GMOs are generally safe, it is safe to assume that time has also been a factor in peoples restlessness. During this economic garboil that the United States is suffering (an estimated 17 trillion dollars), many farmers have been looking for any and all possible ways of slip their agricultural costs so theirprofit margins can become higher. genetically modified crops have been the answer, especially with all the companies that have a current high demand for them, these farmers have definitely exploited that demand.You cant really blame them as its really these corporations trying to cut cost when there mass producing these food products (especially frozen foods). They are numerous citizen outr separately groups, like the Coalition for Safe Affordable Foods assume to humble costs but assert the same sound quality food and as time continues these groups will only become stronger and stronger simply because of how many people are starting to realize how unhealthy their daily food from grocery stores actually is. The labeling uproar is only the first gradation in what promises to be a extensive process to defend Americas food increasingly healthy. These Genetically modified crops are planted in handle similar to regular crops and they interact at one time with different organisms that wo uld normally feed on the crops and would interact incidentally with other creatures in the food chain.Again like normal crops, the pollen from the engineered crop is released into the environment, which has led to serious concerns about the possible effects that genetically engineered crops on other species and about the gene flow, the give of alleles (a number of alternative forms of same gene or same genetic locus) or genes from one population to some other. In valet these lower agricultural costs arent the only useful trait that genetically engineered crops can have. Since they are genetically engineered, companies and farmers can chose exactly what they want to genetically altered. Some common useful traits for genetically engineered crops are resistance to pests/herbicides, able to increase nutritional value, and for the production of other valuable goods such as pharmaceutical drugs. These crops, while below development, are able to thrive in environmental conditions outs ide the species native range. evidently there are some big negatives with genetically engineered crops, most of which have been made relatively public, but there are some positives if companies start using genetically altered plants in a more responsible manner.The willingness of consumers to pay a agio price for organic foods (food not genetically modified) has come at a time when genetically modified foods have come under scrutiny. Studies, like Lusk JL, Jamal M. Kurlander L, Roucan M, Taulman L, whom created a meta-analysis of genetically modified food valuation studies comprise, in a review of 25studies, found a premium of 29 percent for non-genetically modified foods. These studies also bring outed that Europeans are a groovy deal more willing to pay a premium for non-GM foods than their American counterpart. This is also unchanging with public policy, as there are required labeling of all genetically modified. In the United States, although there may be change in the fu ture due to a large increase in consumers demand to know exactly what is departure in their body, electrostatic has no labeling policies.The one exception in the United States is Whole Foods, who independently (mainly because they view themselves as the healthy grocery store compared to the Food Lions, Walmart, and Targets of the world) announced at Natural Products exposition West in March 2013, that all products in every store in the United States and Canada moldiness be labeled to indicate if they contain genetically modified organisms (GMO) per Whole Foods press release. As of late, genetic modification of food has been associated with a great deal of media attention, although technically this rise of media reporting was by the spring of 1999 (add). With the rise of GMO cognisance groups (especially when considering food) media attention has risen in the past decade due to consumer complaints have also led to a more close eye on what exactly is going on, and further investig ation into what we, as a country, are put into our body. Through all of the media frenzy and consumer uproar, eat healthy movements have led many of these consumers to question the boldness of the GMO companies claiming their products are healthy.Many people are looking to European countries as secernate on how to run a healthy country, but in reality there is a great deal of precaution (an important theme in internationalistic relation, especially in environment and public health instances) has been a very clarified question in transatlantic relations, especially pertaining to regulation laws. This precaution usually stems from the differences in laws in how genetically modified foods can be shipped from country to country. GMOs are good examples of how regulatory laws greatly diverge from country to country (the European Federal has much more strict regulatory laws compared to the United States). There has been a positive trend especially at the state/community level, where in some cases there has been extensive legislation and policy changes over the past quarter century. I moot that the biggest mystery in all this genetically modified food chaos is the FDAs lack of influence, which has in turncreated tension between them and various states and has ultimately caused a guessing game in the grocery aisle for many customers.The common thought between consumers is that the FDA has not played virtually enough roles when regulating genetically modified foods. Due to their negligence farms are rapidly increasing their use of genetically modified crops (which have a significantly lower cost per square foot then natural crops), which has increased their presence in food. A perfect example of a drastic rise in genetically modified ingredients is the soybean in the United States over only the last 10 years. In 1997 17 percent of the soybean acreage was genetically modified, and today that portion is upwards of an astounding 93 percent. The FDAs presence woul d be a great benefit to the eat healthy movements, and at some point they will be forced to make their move.It is understandable that consumers are now standing up and demanding to know if GMOs are present in their food. It is their right, and unfortunately due to the United States reputation of catering to big business (i.e. oil/gas prices) it is taken away. There have been many positive strides in this eat healthy front, and the numbers of these groups will only continue to rise, especially if the FDA doesnt footfall in. Consumers have a right to know what is in their food, and until they achieve that right, they will fight for themselves and for the children of America.Genetically modified organisms have brought good news and a brighter future for many, but have also been called into question by our morals. Genetically modified organisms or GMOs, have had a huge impact when it comes to foods and its production along with any other areas it may touch. There is a spacious spect rum, from ending world hunger to being able to produce indulgent, all the same unnecessary, foods like burgers in a lab (Lynas, 2014). Its a truly fascinating thing to see such unimaginable science at work and the endless, and quite unclear, possibilities it may bring. With an unmeasured amount of uncertain prospects, should there be some rules, standards, or guidelines set in place and reinforced for those who are practicing the science? beau monde has witnessed how technology can benefit us, but we have also come to realize the many downsides following close behind. Society needs to take the time to analyze both sides of the spectrum related to genetically modified organisms, crops, and food, when it comes to our environment, ourmorals, and our ethical motive.Golden rice is one of the most talked about gifts produced by GMOs. The GMOs that created thriving rice have made it possible for it to produce beta-carotene, in hopes of reducing vitamin A deficiency (Lynas, 2014). An in dependent humanitarian room runs the project, though there are doubts as to where the technological producers intentions truly lie. Society has seen the interests they have in looking for ways to end world hunger, but the revenue GMOs also produce can be a strong motivational factor. Malnutrition has been a problem for some unfortunate countries, most of which are un actual and poverty stricken. Countries who either cannot plant crops due to lack of fertile land, or do not have the money to buy nourishment. When something as precious as golden rice looks so likeable and promising, why is it that there are organizations such as Greenpeace rising against these good crops? (Lynas, 2014) Genetically modified organisms are beneficial in many ways. The GMOs used to cultivate a new class of crops, known as genetically modified crops, have a list of other valuable qualities anyhow its fruitful fields.Think about a farmers market or any other store where you may do your grocery shopping. no infer it being filled with many chatoyant and delightful looking vegetables and fruits, a real lavish produce dream. That dream is not far from becoming true if GM crops were able to truly flourish. There are crops, such as the Bt brinjal (genetically modified eggplant variation). Bt brinjal are resistant to certain complications that farmers must combat during the harvest. Having resistant genetically modified crops would remove the need to spray insecticides, thus reducing exposure of carcinogenic residues for both farmers and consumers (Lynas, 2014). Mark Lynas utter in his article titled proficient Crops, These crops can reduce the use of environmentally damaging agrochemicals, and several have been developed by public-sector organizations concerned with food security, the drop-off of poverty, and sustainability.The lists of advantages GM crops have shown so far in our environment bring some people hope for a well-off future. There is the opportunity to go the environ ment, our morals, and our ethics with these advanced crops. The ability to produce a crop that willyield extensive bounties could reduce the need to look for more fertile land. With less land, but a bigger harvest, the environment and its inhabitants could certainly thrive. Also, GM crops that are more resistant allow our environment to be less contaminate by insecticides, pesticides, and other undesirable toxins (Caplan, 2013). There is this strong chance that genetically modified crops, and their fruits, can prove the deceive is greener on the other side. And though the unvisited sight seems pleasant and somewhat necessary, would one dare to game off into an unknown area? The notable technology of genetically modified crops and foods has much to offer. Nonetheless there are uncaused consequences that are growing silently, and even though they are not wholly formulated, they must be addressed.Unintended consequences are unanticipated outcomes society must face when it is s tubborn to proceed with a decision, a cut across of action. There are many reasons why these consequential drawbacks arise, some that are inescapably unavoidable (Vernon, 1979). Researchers are only humans who make mistakes, and can overlook olive-sized details, which can lead story to hapless outcomes. like with any technology, genetically modified organisms should not be dismissed as inconsequential. There are still many nonreciprocal questions scientists have yet to address when it comes to genetically modified crops. The main reason is that genetically modified technology is still in the early stages. There is a vast array of knowledge in the master, yet there is still a lot of experimentation required in shape to consider GMOs stable and safe. The author of the relate of GMO on Environment and Human Health Jai theologyheja shares some scary, but possible unintended consequences GM crops can lead to in the near future. The most controversial term being used on the topi c of GM crops is genetic pollution, which basically describes what could happen when genetically modified organisms contaminate organisms unintendedly.Genetic pollution can affect the ecological system in many ways. The lordless flow of genetic information being released by GM crops can cause organic or untreated organisms, to lie withly be wiped out (Godheja, 2013). GMOs are not organic, and if they were to poison our entire environment, nothing would be considered natural anymore. Recently, there was an interview with a farmer who was growing organic fruit, but whentested, the end product had traces of GMOs. This discovery lead to people questioning what they are consuming. Farmers have everything to gain, but what of the people ingesting the supposed safe yet unidentified creations? Not to mention, the environment is ever-changing, evolving, and modifying to be able to survive in its own natural way. Therefore the, now modified as well, organisms that have invariably attacked the farmers harvest can, and more than likely will, find a way to develop resistance against pesticides and herbicides at hand (Godheja, 2013). Suddenly our delightful, and prosperous, dreams start to turn into a bitter nightmare.As the saying goes, One mans trash is another mans treasure, just as well can be said about our nightly thoughts. One persons dreams could be anothers nightmares. The world is filled with numerous cultures that each has their own themes, opinions, religion, and thoughts on how individuals should live their life. The ethics and morals of people, already seen as not being defined clearly by any one populace, extend even more when thought about on a global scale. The rights and wrongs could be flipped the evils of some can be seen as blessings to others, and the good can be interpreted as wicked depending on the mentality. Now throw in a contentious subject matter like GMOs, and heads are rally to clash. Some add together GM crops are extensively worthwhil e and should be fully supported, while the opposing side calls into question not only its safety but its ethical issues as well.Al-Hayani states in his article, God has commanded us to assay knowledge and make discoveries to weaken our lives and our environment (Al-Hayani, 2007). However, due to the assorted mindsets, the definition of what may be better is uncertain. Ethics is defined as the playing area of insideng the right thing, so what people must figure out and come to a conclusion is whether genetically modified food is ethical. For some this question is not easily answered because there are numerous, both good and bad, things to consider. Furthermore even when those considerations are taken into account and categorized, one can still stand as undecided. An individuals ethics can lie all over the place, and never be clearly defined. Ethics are what make each person who they are, and can swiftly change depending on the fortune they find themselves under. One shouldnt be judge by their actions, but it does help outline their code of ethics and morals. morality has a huge impact on many of our ethics. Everything created by God is considered natural and blessed by God, thus there is nothing wrong about his creations (Sandu, 2010). GMOs are not considered natural because humans have created them, and God himself even though he created the means cannot bless them. According to its benign is the rehearsal Sandu repeats in his article as a biblical quotation, in order for his audience to understand God created grass and trees that would produce seeds that would in return produce more fruitful trees. The trees produced were pure breeds, or good species. There was the chance of crossbreeding, but this was still considered naturally hybrid because there was no human interaction involved (Sandu, 2010). A rule of thumb to guess in this context is once humans have interfered with natural processes, for example putting two species unlikely to crossbreed in a n enclosed area for that intention, then direct the creation becomes tarnishedunnatural.Consequently it is then believed to be unethical by some. Yet others would agree the benefits GMOs have provided are ethically sound. tone ending back to Al-Hayanis statement, the creation of GMOs, though unnatural, has shown some promise in bettering our lives and our environment. Genetically modified crops have provided an abundance of produce, as well as improved products like golden rice, in order to better our lives and that of others in need. With that said, GMOs would seem to be received as ethically sound. It is the peoples social responsibility to address and seek solutions to problems such as world hunger. Society is currently at a point where it has acknowledged problems alike and are searching, even found, answers. It is said that poverty has seen a larger decrease in the past liter years, than the prior five centuries (Al-Hayani, 2007).There is no denying the many benefits techn ology, referring back to our topic of GMOs, can provide to improve our world. One couldnt imagine such commendable technology being questioned or seen as unethical when it is providing society with indefinite aforementioned results. And even so it holds its skeptics. With all the technology on hand(predicate) to us, there are some individuals who make the mistake of believing we control constitution. Its unwelcomed by some to think nature controls us, and unacceptable to give in to the idea we will never have complete control of our environment. Genetically engineered technologies continue to pick up mixed feelings. The unstable technology hasbeen able to deliver assistance to society, but even the worldly provided benefits have been called into question considering its enigma.though we may not all have the same beliefs, there is one statement that stands out and should be remembered by us all God didnt make a mistake, no matter how much well strive or boast, trying to transform ourselves in creators, we cant define things better than the way He did (Sandu, 2010). There is so much technology that serves many outcomes to our people, our society, our environment, and our future. All in all, its important to always keep, not ones, but everybodys best interest in mind.ReferencesAl-Hayani, F. (2007). Biomedical ethics Muslim perspectives on genetic modification. Zygon Journal Of Religion & cognition, 42(1), 153-162. inside10.1111/j.1467-9744.2006.00812.xARS Home. (n.d.). Retrieved from http//ars.usda.gov/main/main.htmBattle over gmo labeling murmuring in us. (2014, march 16). Retrieved from http//www.nst.com.my/world/battle-over-gmo-labeling-rumbling-in-us-1.516003Bizeau, C. (n.d.). Social, political, and economic impact. Retrieved from http//tbcgeneticmod.wix.com/gmosCAPLAN, A. L. (2013). Genetically circumscribed Food good, bad, ugly. register of Higher Education, 60(2), B4-B5.Catacora-Vargas, G. (2012). Socio-economic considerations in gmo decision-maki ng . Retrieved from http//www.ensser.org/fileadmin/files/1.3-Catacora-paper.pdfColson, G., & Rousu, M. C. (2013). What do consumer surveys and experiments reveal and conceal about consumer preferences for genetically modified foods?. GM Crops & Food, 4(3), 1-8. doi10.4161/gmcr.26322Constable, A., Jonas, D., Cockburn, A. Davi, A., Edwards, G., Hepburn, P. &Samuels, F. (2007). History of safe use as applied to the safety assessment of novel foods and foods derived from genetically modified organisms. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 45(12), 2513- 2525.Debora , W. (2000, April). Genetically modified foods Harmful or helpful?. Retrieved from http//www.csa.com/discoveryguides/gmfood/overview.phpDevos, Y., Maeseele, P., Reheul, D., van Speybroeck, L., & De Waele, D. (2008). Ethics in the societal debate on genetically modified organisms A (re)quest for sense and sensibility. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 21(1), 29. doihttp//dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10806-007-9057-6Godheja, J. (2013). Impact of GMOS on environment and human health. Recent Research In Science & Technology, 5(5), 26-29.Helme, M. (2013). Genetically Modified Food Fight The FDA Should Step Up to the Regulatory Plate so States Do Not Cross the Constitutional Line. manganese Law Review, 98(1), 356-384.Hiatt, Shon R., and Sangchan Park. Lords of the Harvest Third- party trance and Regulatory Approval of Genetically Modified Organisms. Academy of Management Journal (forthcoming).Lynas, M. (2014). genuine Crops. Technology Review, 117(1), 12.Prah, P. (2014, March 03). Heres what gmo labeling will cost you. Retrieved from http//www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/13/gmo-labels_n_4956995.htmlSandu, G. H. (2010). scriptural Bioethics essay concerning genetically modified organisms. scientific Papers Series D, Animal Science The International Session Of Scientific communication theory Of The Faculty Of Animal Science, 12-14.Schrer, W., & Schmidt, G. (2013). Supporting supervise effects ofgenetically modified organisms by GIS-technologies and geodata an overview. Biorisk Biodiversity & Ecosystem Risk Assessment, 8111-120. doi10.3897/biorisk.8.4038Selected Internet Resources on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs). (n.d.). Retrieved from http//www.istl.org/10-winter/internet2.htmlVernon, R. (Feb., 1979). Political Theory, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 57-73, Unintended Consequences Published by keen-witted Publications, Inc.Stable URL http//www.jstor.org/stable/190824 Accessed 25/08/2010 1552University of California San Diego. (n.d.). Genetically modified organisms (gmo). Retrieved from http//www.bt.ucsd.edu/gmo.htmlWirth, D. A. (2013). The world trade organization dispute concerning genetically modified organisms forethought meets international trade law. Vermont Law Review, 37(4), 1153- 1188.Wohlers, A. E. (2013). Labeling of genetically modified food. Politics & The Life Sciences, 32(1), 73-84. doi10.2990/32_1_73